The Only Way To End Gun Violence Is To Ban Guns Completely

Nor can guns always be kept out of the wrong hands, for we cannot always
know who will do evil, and those known to be hellbent on doing harm to
others will often circumvent restrictions.  Thus, the only realistic way
to prevent mass shootings and end gun violence would be a total gun
ban, ruthlessly enforced. Unfortunately, gun control advocates’ rhetoric
is deliberately crafted to obscure this uncomfortable reality.

The Only Way To End Gun Violence Is To Ban Guns Completely

Macron Is Picking A Fight With Trump Out Of Empty Arrogance

In short, while U.S. presidents for several decades have emphasized a
humble role, and Obama was the quintessence of it, none ever really
thought that the United States was bound by anything other than our
national interests when faced with real threats or challenges to our
interests. Every U.S. president has acted at times without and even
sometimes contrary to UN and “international community” wishes. They just
knew not to acknowledge it.

Such is the pretense all are supposed to honor. But everyone knows
the United States is the guarantor of the world order we have enjoyed
since 1945, an order built on the concepts of the inviolability of
borders (sovereignty) and the free movement of goods. No one thinks
Europe is going to save itself from another attempt to dominate it as
the Nazis did then the Soviets, although I would like to see them arrive
at that ability. No one thinks that any entity other than the United
States can prevent China from controlling global trade through the
Asia-Pacific sea lanes. No one thinks that any entity other than the
United States can face down aggressors like Iran or North Korea.

Everyone knows all this, but saying it is apparently rude, impolitic,
undiplomatic. For small and weak states, it might be an unpleasant
truth, but they hardly are very bothered by the knowledge since it is
obvious. But if you are a great power seeking to displace the United
States because you want a change in the world order, such as, say,
China, Russia, or Iran; or if you are a great power who no longer is as
relevant as you once were, such as, say, France, then it does bother you
a lot for the U.S. president to speak so plainly.

Macron Is Picking A Fight With Trump Out Of Empty Arrogance

Where, today, is any strong competition from less “verifiable” but substantially valuable modes of insight, such as provided by literature and the fine arts, philosophy and theology? Being “scientific” is not the only criterion for what is verifiable. True scientists do not look down on methods of knowing outside of their domain, aware of the very real limitations of their work. In fact, some have tapped into that vast reservoir of “unquantifiables” so despised by positivists, such as the divine inspirations that formed the complex mathematical theorems in the mind of Ramanujan.